当前位置:黑龙江地方站首页 > 龙江新闻 > 正文

广州长安医院解扎手术怎么样好不好度大夫南医三院在那

2019年09月19日 15:03:56    日报  参与评论()人

广州长安不孕医院妇科检查怎么样增城市人民医院做药物流产多少钱职场新人弥补错误六大准则 --9 :37: 来源: Everyone makes mistakes. Usually you can correct your error or just get about it and move on. Making a mistake at work, however, can be more serious. It may cause problems your employer and even affect the company's bottom line. Repercussions will ultimately trickle down to you.  人人都会犯错通常情况下你可以改正你的错误或者干脆忘掉它并继续前行但若在工作中犯错就要严重得多了,它很可能给你的雇主造成麻烦甚至碰触到公司的底线,而这些后果最终会反应到你的头上  Simply correcting your mistake and moving on may not be an option. When you make a mistake at work your career may depend on what you do next.  仅仅改正错误然后继续向前可能并不现实若在工作中犯了错,你的职业生涯就取决于你下一步的行动了  Admit Your Mistake  承认错误  Tell your boss about your mistake immediately. The only exception is if you make an insignificant error that will not affect anyone. Otherwise, don't try to hide your mistake. You will look terrible if someone else discovers it.  立刻跟你的老板承认你的错误除非你犯的错无关紧要且影响不到别人,否则不要试图掩饰你的错误,因为如果错误被发现,你会变得很惨  Present Your Boss With a Plan To Fix Your Mistake  带着能弥补错误的计划去见老板  When you go to your boss to confess your mistake, you must have a plan correcting it. Present your plan clearly. Tell your boss how long it will take to implement your plan and if there are any costs involved.  当你去向老板承认错误的时候,必须带着一个能够弥补错误的计划把你的计划讲清楚告诉老板你的计划要多久才会生效,或者是否需要额外的费用  Don't Blame Anyone Else Your Mistake  不要因为你的错误责怪任何人  Pointing fingers won't help anyone if you make a mistake. Encourage those who may share responsibility to follow your lead in confessing to your boss.  如果你犯了错,指责别人帮不了你鼓励那些愿意和你分担责任的人跟着你一起去找老板承认错误  Apologize Your Mistake But Don't Beat Yourself Up  为错误道歉但不要把自己打倒  There's a big difference between admitting your mistake and beating yourself up about it. Take responsibility but don't berate yourself making it, especially in public.  承认错误和把自己打倒之间有很大的差别承担责任,但不要苛责自己,尤其是在公共场合  Correct Your Mistake on Your Own Time  用自己的时间弥补错误  If you have to spend extra hours at work to correct your mistake, don't expect to be paid that time. You can also use your lunch hour or come into work early.  如果你不得不加班来弥补你的错误,那么不要指望拿加班费你还可以用午餐时间或者提早上班来做这些事情广州天河长安医院是几甲 Apparently, the most talked about TV series in China right now is Red Sorghum, currently broadcasting on four major networks. And here are a few reasons why you might want to tune in: 1) It’s adapted from the novel Red Sorghum Clan by Nobel Prize-winning author Mo Yan, which aly had a renowned film adaptation in 1987; ) it’s directed by Zheng Xiaolong, best known helming Legend of Zhen Huan; 3) and it’s Zhou Xun’s first return to the small screen after more than a decade.广州白云产科在线咨询

广州开发区医院做人流-01-18 :: 来源:广州天河体检好的医院 "I didn't know what to expect because it felt like all the things, from MV shooting to hitting the road, were the first time me, which was exciting," he says.广州天河市治疗妇科

广州长安医院做人受Singer-songwriterMariah Careyperms onstage duringBET Honors at Warner Theatre in Washington February 8, .[PhotoAgencies] 股神巴菲特与安德森关于比特币的口水战 -- :51:7 来源: 安德森是位德高望重的传奇投资人,一位是风头正劲的新锐大佬,但巴菲特和安德森这两位举足轻重的投资家对虚拟货币比特币的态度却大相径庭巴菲特警告称,离比特币远点;而安德森却说,巴菲特不懂技术,纯粹是瞎扯不过,或许两人的观点都没错   It's not often that billionaire investor Warren Buffett gets called out being clueless.   身价亿万的投资家沃伦?巴菲特被人称作无知,这种情况可不常见   But that's essentially what venture capitalist Marc Andreessen did this week at a virtual currency conference when he said, in reference to Warren Buffet's advice that investors stay away from Bitcoin, that "The historical track record of old white men crapping on new technology they don't understand is at, I think, 0%." Andreessen was responding to an appearance on CN where Buffett opined:   不过这确实是风险投资家马克?安德森上周在虚拟货币会议上所说的话针对沃伦?巴菲特让投资者远离比特币的建议,他说:“一直以来,这些白人老头对自己不了解的新技术发表的言论全部都是瞎说”安德森对巴菲特在美国全国广播公司(CN)上提出的观点做出了回应当时,巴菲特说:   "Stay away. Bitcoin is a mirage. It's a method of transmitting money. It's a very effective way of transmitting money, and you can do it anonymously and all that. A check is a way of transmitting money, too. Are checks worth a whole lot of money just because they can transmit money? Are money orders? You can transmit money by money orders. People do it. I hope bitcoin becomes a better way of doing it, but you can replicate it a bunch of different ways and it will be. The idea that it has some huge intrinsic value is just a joke in my view."   “离远点比特币是海市蜃楼这是一种转移资金的手段它是一种有效的转移途径,而且可以通过匿名实现这个过程,还有诸如此类的一些特色不过票也是一种转移金钱的手段就因为票可以转移金钱,所以它就价值连城吗?邮政汇票呢?大家也可以通过邮政汇款转移钱人们也是这么做的我希望比特币能成为更好的转移金钱的手段,但你可以用许多方法创造出类似的货币,将来也的确会出现这种情况在我看来,认为比特币拥有某种巨大内在价值的想法非常可笑”   And yesterday Business Insider's Henry Blodget entered the fray, defending Buffett's skepticism of Bitcoin, saying it wasn't based on ignorance of the technology as Andreessen asserts, but a healthy skepticism of all new technologies. To back up his argument, Blodget ed at length from a Buffett-penned , which appeared in tune in 1999. The was written during the height of dotcom mania, as Buffett explained why he avoided investing in the flurry of new technologies that were then hitting the market. Wrote Buffett:   昨天,商业新闻网战Business Insider的亨利?布拉吉也加入了论战,他为巴菲特对比特币的怀疑态度进行了辩护,表示巴菲特并不是像安德森所说,是由于对技术的无知,而是一种对所有新技术的合理的质疑为了撑自己的观点,布拉吉详尽地引用了由巴菲特执笔,登载于1999年《财富杂志上的一篇文章文章撰写于网络狂热的高峰期,巴菲特在文中解释了自己为什么不在当时冲击市场的新技术的骚动中跟风投资巴菲特当时写道:   "The key to investing is not assessing how much an industry is going to affect society, or how much it will grow, but rather determining the competitive advantage of any given company and, above all, the durability of that advantage."   “投资的关键不在于评估这个产业将对社会产生多大影响,或是它将发展到多大规模,而在于判定目标公司有多少竞争优势最重要的是,那种优势能维持多久”   In other words, it's not that Buffett is ignorant about technology. It's just that he understands that it's impossible to know which specific investments will benefit from a technology's widesp adoption, even if you are prescient enough to know what technologies will revolutionize the world and how they will do so. Buffett chooses the examples of the car and aviation industries. Many people saw the revolutionary potential of these inventions, but such clairvoyance would be worthless to an investor if he chose the wrong car company. The same goes aviation -- which has notoriously been a difficult industry to profit from, despite its revolutionary effect on society.   换句话说,并不是巴菲特不了解技术只是他明白,要确切知道哪种投资能够从技术的广泛普及中受益不太可能,哪怕你足够有先见之明,预见到哪种技术将彻底改变世界,以及通过何种方式改变巴菲特举了汽车和航空业的例子许多人看出了这些发明具有革命性的潜力,但如果投资者没有选对汽车公司,那这种先见之明就毫无价值航空业也是一样——尽管它对社会起到了革命性的作用,但从这个行业获利的难度也是众所周知  And by this logic, Buffett is right to be skeptical of Bitcoin. Whether you hope to profit from the rise of cryptocurrencies by investing in Bitcoin itself, or companies that would profit from Bitcoin'sascendence like the Andreessen-backed Coinbase, you're going to need to know more than just the fact that cryptocurrencies will change the world to make money. After all, what if you buy a bunch of bitcoins, but it turns out that a bitcoinvarient becomes the dominant m of virtual currency?   根据这种逻辑,巴菲特对比特币持怀疑态度合情合理不管你是希望借加密货币的崛起之机投资比特币获利,还是像安德森持的Coinbase这类公司借比特币的强势而获利,但在加密货币将改变世界这一事实之外,你还需要懂得更多才能挣到钱毕竟,假如你买了一大堆比特币,但最后却是比特币的某一变种占据了虚拟货币的统治地位,到时候怎么办呢?   Adresseen, in an email interview with bes, called this analysis "unsophisticated." Writes Andreessen:   安德森在接受《福布斯杂志的邮件采访中表示,这种分析“单纯而天真”他写道:   "This is a standard trope of technology criticism by people who don't understand technology ... 'Yes, sure, it's great technology, but it won't be useful or valuable in the way that those crazy nerds think it will be useful or valuable.' I've heard it my whole life applied to every new important technology. It's fake sophistication -- it sounds nuanced but it's not."   “不了解技术的人总是用这种比喻来批判技术……‘是啊,当然,这技术很棒,但并不像那些疯狂的呆子所想的那么有用或有价值’针对每种重要的新技术,都有这类论调,我这辈子已经听了太多这不过是故作高深——看起来分析入微,实际上并非如此”   The problem with this comeback is that Buffett isn't trying to sound sophisticated or nuanced. Buffett's very point is that a sophisticated or nuanced understanding of technology isn't necessary -- and is perhaps even detrimental -- to making money on investments. Buffett's style of investing requires very sophisticated knowledge of financials while avoiding understanding technology fear that an emotional connection to the promise of that technology can take his eye off the ball of profits.   安德森的反驳存在一个问题:巴菲特并不想显得高深或是分析入微巴菲特的重要观点在于:对技术有着深刻或细致的了解,并不是投资获利的必要因素,这甚至反而可能是有害的巴菲特的投资风格要求他熟知金融知识而避免过分了解技术,以免对这项技术的前景的情感羁绊影响他对利润的关注   Essentially this disagreement can all be boiled down to the fact that Andreessen and Buffett are two different types of investors. Andreessen is a venture capital guy who makes his money by putting bets on countless long shots, and only needing to be right a fraction of the time. To know what long-shot bets you should make requires a deep knowledge of the technologies you're investing in to aid you in your ecasting of how they will change the world. But even Andreessen knows he's only going to be right a fraction of the time on an investment-by-investment basis. Buffett takes the complete opposite approach -- by either investing in mature companies with very small and hard-to-perceive advantages over their competitors, or by leveraging his reputation and access to capital to make sure bets not available to anyone else (like the stake he took in Goldman Sachs at the height of the financial crisis).   实际上,这场争论可以归结为一个事实:安德森和巴菲特是两种不同类型的投资者安德森是个在许多高风险的投资项目上下注挣钱的投资家,他只需要在短期内正确就够了想知道应该投资哪些高风险项目,你需要对投资的技术有着深刻的了解,从而帮助你预测它们将会如何改变世界不过即便安德森自己也知道,他这种不断投资的方式只能让他做到短期内正确巴菲特的方式则正好相反,他或是投资那些比起竞争对手而言有着细微和难以察觉的优势的成熟公司,或是利用他的声望及资金来保其他任何人都无法参与下注【比如在金融危机最严重的时候,他买入了高盛投资公司(Goldman Sachs)的股票】   In other words, both men are right. (And that's why they have so much more money than you.)   换句话说,两个人都是对的(这也是为什么他们拥有的财富比你多得多)佛山哪里有人流从化市人民医院正规吗怎么样

广州长安女子医院治疗静脉曲张多少钱
番禺妇幼医院妇科挂号
海珠区第一人民医院体检多少钱问医面诊
广州中山大学附属第三医院怎么样正规吗
飞度云热点番禺做孕检哪家医院最好的
广州番禺妇科哪家医院权威
广州检查激素到哪家医院
广州结扎修复要多少钱同城指南广州天河哪个医院人流比较专业
中国新闻广州天河长安做宫腔镜手术爱问在线
(责任编辑:图王)
 
五大发展理念

龙江会客厅

广州医院无痛人流价格
广州长安不孕不育医院检查造影 番禺计划生育医院官网妙手分类 [详细]
中山医院在线咨询
广州番禺人民医院生殖中心怎么样好不好 广东长安医院做结扎恢复手术 [详细]
广州天河南方医院结扎复通
东莞那家医院结扎复通最好 99新闻广州长安不育医院在线咨询飞度晚报 [详细]
从化人民医院怎么预约
健康常识广州长安女子医院治疗多囊卵巢 佛山不孕不育大医院哪家医院最好的最新分享广州长安医院在哪个区 [详细]